<div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10.5pt" ><div dir="ltr" >Thank you Brad Bishop (For offline review), Kurt Taylor and Andrew Geissler for your kind support.</div>
<div dir="ltr" > </div>
<div dir="ltr" >Yes CI can be included.</div>
<div dir="ltr" >( In my opinion, If we want to do good CI, we may have to do more left shift from CT bucket</div>
<div dir="ltr" >as well). Dynamic CI, It should be. If major code drop associate with a feature/Area,</div>
<div dir="ltr" >then test bucket of that CT bucket should be executed as part of CI. We can discuss on this.</div>
<div dir="ltr" > </div>
<div dir="ltr" >For eg. IPMI user management features getting enabled then entire IPMI bucket can be run part of CI.</div>
<div dir="ltr" > </div>
<div dir="ltr" >Test work group meeting:</div>
<div dir="ltr" > </div>
<div dir="ltr" >As test based on release planning, Would like to have this meeting either on the same day after the release plan meeting or a day after the release plan meeting.</div>
<div dir="ltr" > </div>
<div dir="ltr" >Currently release plan meeting happens on Thursday 3 PM CST.</div>
<div dir="ltr" >Proposal to have test work group meeting is either on Thursday evening 7 or 8 PM CST.</div>
<div dir="ltr" > </div>
<div dir="ltr" >Thank you again for all your inputs.</div>
<div dir="ltr" > </div>
<div dir="ltr" > </div>
<div dir="ltr" > </div>
<div dir="ltr" ><div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt" ><div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt" ><div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt" ><div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt" ><div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt" ><div dir="ltr" style="margin-top: 20px;" ><div style="font-size: 12pt; font-weight: bold; font-family: sans-serif; color: #7C7C5F;" >Sivas R. S</div>
<div style="font-size: 8pt; font-family: sans-serif; margin-top: 10px;" ><div><span style="font-weight: bold; color: #336699;" >E-mail: </span><a href="mailto:sivas.srr@in.ibm.com" style="color: #555">sivas.srr@in.ibm.com</a></div>
<div>E2E FSP Test Architecture, OpenBMC Test Lead, Lab Management</div>
<div>Automation is good, Identifying Defect earlier is better always</div>
<div>9902233500</div>
<div>08046678273</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
<div dir="ltr" > </div>
<div dir="ltr" > </div>
<blockquote data-history-content-modified="1" dir="ltr" style="border-left:solid #aaaaaa 2px; margin-left:5px; padding-left:5px; direction:ltr; margin-right:0px" >----- Original message -----<br>From: Andrew Geissler <geissonator@gmail.com><br>Sent by: "openbmc" <openbmc-bounces+sivas.srr=in.ibm.com@lists.ozlabs.org><br>To: Kurt Taylor <kurt.r.taylor@gmail.com><br>Cc: OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org><br>Subject: Re: openbmc test work group - wiki<br>Date: Fri, Jul 20, 2018 11:12 PM<br> <br><tt><font size="3" face="" >On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM krtaylor <kurt.r.taylor@gmail.com> wrote:</font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >></font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >> On 7/19/18 10:47 PM, Sivas Srr wrote:</font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >></font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >></font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >> Hi All,</font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >></font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >> Have <a href="https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/wiki/Test-work---group" target="_blank">https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/wiki/Test-work---group</a> created this page in our</font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >> wiki for upcoming test work group. Please review and provide your inputs / raise questions if you need any clarification.</font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >></font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >></font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >> Thanks Sivas! I'll join and help however I can. When would be a good time for a kickoff meeting?</font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >></font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >> It looks like the initial list is a good summary, where do we start, what is the most painful thing to fix? Also, is there room for remote (third-party) CI testing in this WG?</font></tt><br><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >Second this one, Brad and I were just chatting a bit on this the other</font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >day, how could we scale the HW CI testing with third parties. Would</font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >def like it if we could discuss within this WG (and any other</font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >improvements to our CI process)</font></tt><br><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >></font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >> Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)</font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >></font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >> Sivas R. S</font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >> E-mail: sivas.srr@in.ibm.com</font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >></font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >> Automation is good, Identifying Defect earlier is better always</font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >> 9902233500</font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >> 08046678273</font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >></font></tt><br><tt><font size="3" face="" >></font></tt></blockquote>
<div dir="ltr" > </div></div><BR>