[PATCH 20/64] i2c: fsi: reword according to newest specification

Andi Shyti andi.shyti at kernel.org
Wed Mar 27 07:08:47 AEDT 2024


Hi Wolfram,

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 02:25:13PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Match the wording of this driver wrt. the newest I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, I3C
> specifications and replace "master/slave" with more appropriate terms.
> They are also more specific because we distinguish now between a remote
> entity ("client") and a local one ("target").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas at sang-engineering.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-fsi.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-fsi.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-fsi.c
> index 10332693edf0..5eaf2c85a72c 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-fsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-fsi.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>  /*
> - * FSI-attached I2C master algorithm
> + * FSI-attached I2C controller algorithm

As this change is all about renaming, I think we need to be a bit
more consistent in using either host or controller, at least
within the same driver.

In this driver you are using sometimes host and sometimes
controller.

Thanks,
Andi


More information about the openbmc mailing list