Security Working Group meeting - Wednesday August 31 - results

[Michael Richardson]

Patrick Williams <patrick at stwcx.xyz> wrote:
    > I could be wrong on Keylime.  My initial reaction is that it is going
    > to be difficult to get a broad install base on the Verifier side.

Presumably customer that want to have measured boot for their BMC have the
incentive to install such a system.  I know that IBM has sufficiently people
involved with TCG that they ought to already have product that can do this,
but I don't know the product names.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF at sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20220907/e52466d8/attachment.sig>