<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD><TITLE>Re: [PATCH] rapidio/tsi721: Fix mailbox resource reporting</TITLE>
<META content="text/html; charset=unicode" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 9.00.8112.16437"></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr id=idOWAReplyText81148>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>Tsi721 patches are applicable to 3.2-rc1 and newer only. Sorry for not describing it properly.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2 face=Arial>This and following patch are fixes for issues found since 3.2-rc1.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>I will update changelogs for these patches with more details and resubmit them tomorrow.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT size=2 face=Tahoma><B>From:</B> linuxppc-dev-bounces+alexandre.bounine=idt.com@lists.ozlabs.org on behalf of Andrew Morton<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tue 12/6/2011 5:36 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Bounine, Alexandre<BR><B>Cc:</B> linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [PATCH] rapidio/tsi721: Fix mailbox resource reporting<BR></FONT><BR></DIV></DIV>
<DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 14:01:27 -0500<BR>Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@idt.com> wrote:<BR><BR>> Report support of four RapidIO mailboxes (MBOX0 - MBOX3) instead of MBOX0<BR>> only.<BR><BR>I don't know how important these changes are and I don't know what<BR>their end user visible effects are. Hence I am unable to decide which<BR>kernel version(s) we should merge the patches into.<BR><BR>That's why these things should always be explained in changelogs,<BR>please.<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Linuxppc-dev mailing list<BR>Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org<BR><A href="https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev">https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev</A><BR></FONT></P></DIV></BODY></HTML>