one other idea (sorry)<div><br></div><div>Debian is not providing an altivec optimized version. If you want that you have to go with Gentoo. If you were building cpu optimized from the ground up with the libaltivec and perhaps the c++ altivec libraries (that require translation for the changed library calls to all the source codes that use them -- ughh) -- it would be a lot more interesting. I've thought about doing the Gentoo but its a lot of compiling, especially on slower cpus (I've had some experience with fink and macports in MacOSX which want that too)</div>
<div><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:g.liakhovetski@gmx.de">g.liakhovetski@gmx.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:<br>
<br>
> (Sorry for the cross-posting, please ignore if you are not interested in this,<br>
> CC me as I'm not subscribed)<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> First some introductions. I'm Konstantinos Margaritis, a long time<br>
> Amiga/BeOS/Linux user/developer and a PowerPC fan, former Debian Developer,<br>
> also a SIMD/AltiVec fanatic and the author of libfreevec. I've posted this on<br>
> the following sites:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?mode=viewtopic&topic_id=29594&forum=33&start=0&viewmode=flat&order=0" target="_blank">http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?mode=viewtopic&topic_id=29594&forum=33&start=0&viewmode=flat&order=0</a><br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.amiga.org/forums/showthread.php?t=49424" target="_blank">http://www.amiga.org/forums/showthread.php?t=49424</a><br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.morphzone.org/modules/newbb_plus/viewtopic.php?topic_id=6465&forum=11" target="_blank">http://www.morphzone.org/modules/newbb_plus/viewtopic.php?topic_id=6465&forum=11</a><br>
><br>
> <a href="http://aros-exec.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=3768&forum=4" target="_blank">http://aros-exec.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=3768&forum=4</a><br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.haiku-os.org/community/forum/market_research_new_powerpc_system#comment-12604" target="_blank">http://www.haiku-os.org/community/forum/market_research_new_powerpc_system#comment-12604</a><br>
><br>
> To anyone who is not a PowerPC user, it might seem like crazy, but here it<br>
> goes:<br>
><br>
> I'm considering funding the design & production of a new PowerPC system (well,<br>
> the motherboard, the rest are typical pc stuff and a case). No this is not a<br>
> joke, I've been wanting to do this for a long time, and perhaps the chance<br>
> will be given to me now. But before I spend any money on this, I want to do a<br>
> little market research first. I know the market is literally "dying" for a new<br>
> powerpc motherboard, but exactly how many are there that want to buy one?<br>
<br>
Ok, just a short comment. In principle I like diversity, competition, etc.<br>
And it was somewhat sad when Apple abandoned ppc. But honestly - why<br>
should I be buying a ppc desktop system? If we restrict our comparison to<br>
Linux, because that's what I'm using, what advantages would a ppc system<br>
give me over a comparable in price ix86 system? This is not meant<br>
negatively, I just have not followed recent ppc CPUs from the "desktop"<br>
range, so, this is a real honest question. Would such a system provide<br>
more MIPS per Watt at the same price? Or more periferals? Or some specific<br>
hardware blocks unavailable or unsupported om ix86?<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
Guennadi<br>
<br>
><br>
> Ok, let's give some rough specs first. I'm considering 3 choices -not in order<br>
> of probability/importance:<br>
><br>
> 1. MPC8640D-based. It will be dual core at 1Ghz -most likely, higher<br>
> frequencies are much more expensive and the cost of the final board would be<br>
> prohibitive.<br>
> 2. MPC8610-based. Single core at 1Ghz, slightly less expensive, and includes a<br>
> 2D DIU display unit -quite fast, but no 3D unfortunately.<br>
> 3. QorIQ P1022-based. Again dual core at 1Ghz (1055Mhz to be precise). Apart<br>
> from the much lower chip price, this one includes dual gigabit ethernet, dual<br>
> SATA, USB 2.0 and a 2D DIU display unit (same as the MPC8610). So this one<br>
> would lower the cost of the board quite much. Disadvantages: No AltiVec unit<br>
> (it sucks I know), though it includes an SPE unit which is not that bad, and<br>
> availability will be in Q3/Q4 2010, so that's a long wait.<br>
><br>
> Now, the end motherboard will probably be MicroATX (in the 8640D/8610 case) or<br>
> PicoITX (in the P1022 case), and it will definitely include:<br>
><br>
> * SATA connectors<br>
> * USB (possibly 2 back and 2 front, but that's discussable)<br>
> * Dual gigabit (at least one will be there, in the case of the MPC8640D we<br>
> might even have 4!!!)<br>
> * Sound (of course, SPDIF support will definitely be there)<br>
> * 1 PCI-e slot 1x<br>
> * 1 PCI-e slot (4x in the P1022 case, 8x in the MPC86xx cases)<br>
><br>
> Ok, what I want to know is if people would really really buy one of these. End<br>
> price is estimated to be ~around~ 350EUR for the P1022 board or ~500EUR<br>
> (definitely more in the case of 8640D) in the case of the other boards.<br>
> Besides being more expensive, the MPC86xx chips, don't include SATA, USB and<br>
> only one of ethernet/sound (quad-gige in MPC8640D case, or sound in the case<br>
> of MPC8610). I know this sounds a lot, but it's the reality, there is not<br>
> enough funding to build enormous amounts of units and bring the prices down<br>
> substantially, we have to start low and build up from there. In case you are<br>
> wondering, yes, the boards will be designed/produced by bPlan and funded by my<br>
> company (Codex).<br>
><br>
> Support for OSes: Linux definitely, Haiku most probably and there is a<br>
> possibility of supporting AmigaOS/MorphOS, which will depend on the actual<br>
> feedback I get from those users.<br>
><br>
> I would like to make a list of everyone that is really interested in such a<br>
> system, so it would really help me make a decision sooner rather than later if<br>
> you would send me a few personal details to <a href="mailto:markos@codex.gr">markos@codex.gr</a> with subject<br>
> "PowerPC board":<br>
><br>
> * Name<br>
> * Country<br>
> * email (definitely, I'd have to reach you back!)<br>
> * Phone/Skype (optional, please include international prefix)<br>
> * Forum you saw this post (ok, Morphzone in this case)<br>
> * OS of preference<br>
> * board you would be most interested in (MPC8610/MPC8640D/P1022)<br>
> * preferred price (please have in mind the estimated price quotes I mentioned,<br>
> it might be lower but that's not very probable)<br>
> * Other notes/comments<br>
><br>
> Also, I found out that I had to state my case on many forums to prove that<br>
> this is not vapourware. Well, it will not be vapourware, if I get feedback. So<br>
> far the feedback I got can be summarized here:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.codex.gr/index.php?pageID=&blogItem=60" target="_blank">http://www.codex.gr/index.php?pageID=&blogItem=60</a><br>
><br>
> Thanks a lot for your time and I hope this system becomes a reality.<br>
><br>
> Konstantinos Margaritis<br>
><br>
> Codex<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org">Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev</a><br>
<br>
---<br>
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.<br>
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer<br>
<a href="http://www.open-technology.de/" target="_blank">http://www.open-technology.de/</a><br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
--<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to <a href="mailto:debian-powerpc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org">debian-powerpc-REQUEST@lists.debian.org</a><br>
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact <a href="mailto:listmaster@lists.debian.org">listmaster@lists.debian.org</a><br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>