<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Kumar Gala <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org">galak@kernel.crashing.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
On Jul 22, 2009, at 10:38 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
<br>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kumar Gala <<a href="mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org" target="_blank">galak@kernel.crashing.org</a>> wrote:<br>
I'm not seeing any BUG* in traps.c @ line 904.<br>
<br>
<br>
On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:33 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:<br>
<br>
The LTP test case msgctl10.c fails on linux-2.6.29.6 for PowerPC architecture (ppc440)<br>
<br>
<br>
msgctl10 1 B------------[ cut here ]------------<br>
kernel BUG at arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c:904!<br>
Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#9]<br>
<br>
I'm not seeing any BUG* in traps.c @ line 904. Do you have some other patches on top of 2.6.29.6?<br>
<br>
- k<br>
<br>
<br>
I have LTTng patches on top of linux-2.6.29.6.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Does it modify traps.c? Can you see what the code around line 904 looks like and post that.<br><font color="#888888">
<br>
- k<br>
</font></blockquote></div> 896<br> 897 #if defined(CONFIG_XILINX_VIRTEX_5_FXT) && defined(CONFIG_PPC_FPU)<br> 898 if (reason & REASON_ILLEGAL) {<br> 899 if (excep_state < 1) {<br> 900 excep_state++;<br>
901 return;<br> 902 }<br> 903 /* should never get here */<br> 904 BUG();<br> 905 }<br> 906 #endif<br> 907<br> 908 /* Try to emulate it if we should. */<br>
<br><br>-- <br>"The Good You Do, The Best You GET"<br><br>Regards<br>Srikanth Krishnakar<br>**********************<br>