Can we get 5121 support in and add 5200 support later? They are not identical.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Grant Likely <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:grant.likely@secretlab.ca">grant.likely@secretlab.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im"><br>
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Wolfram Sang <<a href="mailto:w.sang@pengutronix.de">w.sang@pengutronix.de</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 10:15:17PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:<br>
>> From: John Rigby <<a href="mailto:jrigby@freescale.com">jrigby@freescale.com</a>><br>
>><br>
>> Based on Domen Puncer's rtc driver for 5200 posted to<br>
>> the ppclinux mailing list:<br>
>> <a href="http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc-embedded/patch?id=11675" target="_blank">http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc-embedded/patch?id=11675</a><br>
>> but never commited anywhere.<br>
>><br>
>> Changes to Domen's original:<br>
>><br>
>> Changed filenames/routine names from mpc5200* to mpc5121*<br>
><br>
> Why not changing it to mpc5xxx? From a glimpse, it should still work on<br>
> MPC5200, too.<br>
<br>
</div>If this is true, the I heartily agree with Wolfram. :-)<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
g.<br>
</font><div class="im"><br>
--<br>
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.<br>
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.<br>
<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~<br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".<br>
Membership options at <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux" target="_blank">http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux</a> .<br>
Please read <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist" target="_blank">http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist</a><br>
before submitting a driver.<br>
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>