[PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/85xx: Add silicon device tree for C293

[Scott Wood]

On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 21:32 -0500, Liu Po-B43644 wrote:
> >  -----Original Message-----
> >  From: Wood Scott-B07421
> >  Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 11:47 PM
> >  To: Liu Po-B43644
> >  Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org; galak at kernel.crashing.org;
> >  Fleming Andy-AFLEMING; Hu Mingkai-B21284
> >  Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/85xx: Add silicon device tree for
> >  C293
> >  
> >  On 07/30/2013 09:13:28 PM, Liu Po-B43644 wrote:
> >  >
> >  > >  -----Original Message-----
> >  > >  From: Wood Scott-B07421
> >  > >  Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 2:28 AM
> >  > >  To: Liu Po-B43644
> >  > >  Cc: linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org; galak at kernel.crashing.org; Fleming
> >  > Andy-
> >  > >  AFLEMING; Hu Mingkai-B21284; Liu Po-B43644
> >  > >  Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/85xx: Add silicon device tree
> >  > for
> >  > >  C293
> >  > >
> >  > >  On 07/30/2013 03:49:22 AM, Po Liu wrote:
> >  > >  > +	crypto at 80000 {
> >  > >  > +/include/ "qoriq-sec6.0-0.dtsi"
> >  > >  > +	};
> >  > >  > +
> >  > >  > +	crypto at 80000 {
> >  > >  > +		reg = <0x80000 0x20000>;
> >  > >  > +		ranges = <0x0 0x80000 0x20000>;
> >  > >  > +
> >  > >  > +		jr at 1000{
> >  > >  > +			interrupts = <45 2 0 0>;
> >  > >  > +		};
> >  > >  > +		jr at 2000{
> >  > >  > +			interrupts = <57 2 0 0>;
> >  > >  > +		};
> >  > >  > +	};
> >  > >
> >  > >  Do these inline the way the example shows.
> >  > Sorry, Scott, I just remember in this way, the node can't be
> >  > recognized by system when run Uboot. The include can't be in the
> >  > crypto at 80000. See the discussion in
> >  > http://git.am.freescale.net:8181/#/c/736/  .
> >  > Maybe I should re-modify the example file.
> >  
> >  git.am.freescale.net is not accessible outside of Freescale; don't
> >  reference it on external lists.  In any case, I don't know what
> >  specifically you want me to look at there.  Just put the explanation here.
> Sorry, I've realize that.
> The fact is that: when put the include into the crypto at xxxx, it can't compile success(make c293pcie.dtb as example). Error will show as:
> 
> ERROR (duplicate_node_names): Duplicate node name /soc at fffe00000/crypto at 80000/jr at 1000

OK... It seems dtc will only merge duplicates when it's not the first
time it's seen the parent node.  We're probably relying on a side-effect
of the intended behavior of accepting duplicates between the multiple
instances of the parent node.

-Scott