[RFC PATCH powerpc] make CONFIG_NUMA depends on CONFIG_SMP

[Michael Ellerman]

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 05:31:58PM +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> I'm not sure whether it makes sense to add this dependency to avoid
> CONFI_NUMA && !CONFIG_SMP. 
> 
> I want to do this because I saw some build errors on next-tree when
> compiling with CONFIG_SMP disabled, and it seems they are caused by some
> codes under the CONFIG_NUMA #ifdefs.  

This seems to make sense to me. Can you please repost with a better
changelog and a description of the actual build error you were seeing.

cheers