From: Tim Abbott <tabbott at ksplice.com>

Tim Abbott tabbott at ksplice.com
Wed Oct 14 02:53:26 EST 2009


There is already an architecture-independent __page_aligned_data macro
for this purpose, so removing the powerpc-specific macro should be
harmless.

Signed-off-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott at ksplice.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_64.h |    8 --------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_64.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_64.h
index 3f17b83..3c7118f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_64.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_64.h
@@ -162,14 +162,6 @@ do {						\
 
 #endif /* !CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
 
-#ifdef MODULE
-#define __page_aligned __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE)))
-#else
-#define __page_aligned \
-	__attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE), \
-		__section__(".data.page_aligned")))
-#endif
-
 #define VM_DATA_DEFAULT_FLAGS \
 	(test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \
 	 VM_DATA_DEFAULT_FLAGS32 : VM_DATA_DEFAULT_FLAGS64)
-- 
1.6.4.3



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list